Match statistics snapshot
- Walsall fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Eastleigh was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 23%).
- Eastleigh held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Eastleigh | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
0Lead | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 2 |
5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
11 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 13Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Eastleigh | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
292Lead | Accurate passes | 154 |
423Lead | Total passes | 234 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Eastleigh | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Eastleigh | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
1 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 4Lead |
0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Eastleigh | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Eastleigh leads shot accuracy (+97% vs Walsall)
Eastleigh leads shot accuracy (+97% vs Walsall)
Walsall leads box penetration (+69% vs Eastleigh)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Walsall leads this block
Eastleigh — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Eastleigh — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Walsall leads this block
Walsall leads territorial pressure (+35% vs Eastleigh)
Walsall leads territorial pressure (+35% vs Eastleigh)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Walsall leads this block
Walsall had the edge in 3 of 4 signals in this block.
Walsall leads (14.0 vs 11.0).
Eastleigh leads (44.2 vs 23.8).
Walsall leads (14.0 vs 12.0).
Walsall leads (17.0 vs 11.0).