Match statistics snapshot
- Enppi fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 33%).
- Enppi held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| El Dakhleya | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 1 |
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| El Dakhleya | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 217 | Accurate passes | 371Lead |
| 329 | Total passes | 470Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| El Dakhleya | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| El Dakhleya | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| El Dakhleya | Statistic | Enppi |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.