Match statistics snapshot
- Haras El Hodood created the clearer chances on xG (0.50 vs 1.26, Δ 0.76).
- Haras El Hodood fired more attempts (23 vs 4 shots).
- El Gouna FC was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| El Gouna Fc | Statistic | Haras El Hodood |
|---|---|---|
| 0.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26Lead |
| 8 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| El Gouna Fc | Statistic | Haras El Hodood |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 198 | Accurate passes | 254Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 357Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| El Gouna Fc | Statistic | Haras El Hodood |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| El Gouna Fc | Statistic | Haras El Hodood |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.63 | Goals prevented | -0.63 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| El Gouna Fc | Statistic | Haras El Hodood |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |