Match statistics snapshot
- Ceramica Cleopatra fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- El Mokawloon was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 23%).
- Ceramica Cleopatra held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| El Mokawloon | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| El Mokawloon | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 212 | Accurate passes | 458Lead |
| 294 | Total passes | 558Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| El Mokawloon | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| El Mokawloon | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| El Mokawloon | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |