Match statistics snapshot
- Pharco was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 13%).
- El Mokawloon held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| El Mokawloon | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| El Mokawloon | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 248Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 358Lead | Total passes | 323 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| El Mokawloon | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| El Mokawloon | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| El Mokawloon | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.