Match statistics snapshot
- Emelec fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Cumbayá was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- Emelec held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Emelec | Statistic | Cumbayá |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 7 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Emelec | Statistic | Cumbayá |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 413Lead | Accurate passes | 305 |
| 486Lead | Total passes | 377 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Emelec | Statistic | Cumbayá |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Emelec | Statistic | Cumbayá |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Emelec | Statistic | Cumbayá |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |