Match statistics snapshot
- Emelec fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- LDU de Quito was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Emelec | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10Lead |
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Emelec | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 243 | Accurate passes | 259Lead |
| 331 | Total passes | 338Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Emelec | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Emelec | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Emelec | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |