Match statistics snapshot
- LDU de Quito fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Emelec was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 29%).
- LDU de Quito held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Emelec | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Emelec | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 235 | Accurate passes | 297Lead |
| 296 | Total passes | 355Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Emelec | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Emelec | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Emelec | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |