Match statistics snapshot
- Macara created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 1.74, Δ 0.75).
- Emelec fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Macara was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Emelec | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Emelec | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 341Lead | Accurate passes | 273 |
| 434Lead | Total passes | 369 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Emelec | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 18Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Emelec | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Emelec | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.