Match statistics snapshot
- Empoli created the clearer chances on xG (0.62 vs 0.40, Δ 0.22).
- Como fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Empoli was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Empoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.40 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Empoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 388Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 464Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Empoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Empoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.48 | Goals prevented | -0.48 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Empoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |