Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (0.31 vs 1.65, Δ 1.34).
- Inter fired more attempts (23 vs 7 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (26% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Empoli | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.65Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Empoli | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 281 | Accurate passes | 477Lead |
| 351 | Total passes | 552Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Empoli | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Empoli | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Empoli | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |