Match statistics snapshot
- Arminia Bielefeld created the clearer chances on xG (1.03 vs 2.09, Δ 1.06).
- Arminia Bielefeld fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Energie Cottbus was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Energie Cottbus | Statistic | Arminia Bielefeld |
|---|---|---|
| 1.03 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.09Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Energie Cottbus | Statistic | Arminia Bielefeld |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 156 | Accurate passes | 369Lead |
| 212 | Total passes | 436Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Energie Cottbus | Statistic | Arminia Bielefeld |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Energie Cottbus | Statistic | Arminia Bielefeld |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Energie Cottbus | Statistic | Arminia Bielefeld |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.