Match statistics snapshot
- Enppi created the clearer chances on xG (1.94 vs 0.74, Δ 1.20).
- Enppi fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 20%).
Enppi vs Al Masry
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Enppi | Statistic | Al Masry |
|---|---|---|
| 1.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Enppi | Statistic | Al Masry |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 284Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 380Lead | Total passes | 325 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Enppi | Statistic | Al Masry |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Enppi | Statistic | Al Masry |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.91 | Goals prevented | -0.91 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Enppi | Statistic | Al Masry |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |