Match statistics snapshot
- Enppi fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 30%).
- Ceramica Cleopatra held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Enppi | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Enppi | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 237 | Accurate passes | 298Lead |
| 330 | Total passes | 403Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Enppi | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Enppi | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Enppi | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.