Match statistics snapshot
- Pharco fired more attempts (13 vs 4 shots).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 31%).
- Pharco held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Enppi | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| 1 |
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Enppi | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 197 | Accurate passes | 339Lead |
| 292 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Enppi | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Enppi | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Enppi | Statistic | Pharco |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.