Match statistics snapshot
- Zamalek SC fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 26%).
- Zamalek SC held more of the ball (74% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Enppi | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Enppi | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 26% | Ball possession | 74%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 132 | Accurate passes | 522Lead |
| 201 | Total passes | 605Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Enppi | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Enppi | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Enppi | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.