Match statistics snapshot
- Enppi created the clearer chances on xG (2.44 vs 1.84, Δ 0.60).
- Enppi fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Enppi was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Enppi | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.44Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.84 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Enppi | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 159 | Accurate passes | 312Lead |
| 254 | Total passes | 407Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Enppi | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Enppi | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.01 | Goals prevented | -0.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Enppi | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.