Match statistics snapshot
- Metalist 1925 Kharkiv created the clearer chances on xG (0.48 vs 1.11, Δ 0.63).
- Metalist 1925 Kharkiv fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Epitsentr Dunayivtsi was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Epitsentr Dunayivtsi | Statistic | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv |
|---|---|---|
| 0.48 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.11Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Epitsentr Dunayivtsi | Statistic | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 274 | Accurate passes | 383Lead |
| 359 | Total passes | 467Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Epitsentr Dunayivtsi | Statistic | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Epitsentr Dunayivtsi | Statistic | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Epitsentr Dunayivtsi | Statistic | Metalist 1925 Kharkiv |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |