Match statistics snapshot
- 1.
- FC Heidenheim fired more attempts (25 vs 12 shots).
- Erzgebirge Aue was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Erzgebirge Aue | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 25Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Erzgebirge Aue | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 322 | Accurate passes | 366Lead |
| 450 | Total passes | 483Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Erzgebirge Aue | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Erzgebirge Aue | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Erzgebirge Aue | Statistic | 1. Fc Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |