Match statistics snapshot
- Erzgebirge Aue created the clearer chances on xG (2.68 vs 2.27, Δ 0.41).
- FC Schweinfurt 05 was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 33%).
- FC Schweinfurt 05 held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Erzgebirge Aue | Statistic | Fc Schweinfurt 05 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.68Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.27 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 18 | Total shots | 18 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Erzgebirge Aue | Statistic | Fc Schweinfurt 05 |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 252 | Accurate passes | 414Lead |
| 319 | Total passes | 487Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Erzgebirge Aue | Statistic | Fc Schweinfurt 05 |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Erzgebirge Aue | Statistic | Fc Schweinfurt 05 |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 10Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Erzgebirge Aue | Statistic | Fc Schweinfurt 05 |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |