Match statistics snapshot
- Grenoble was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
- Grenoble held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Estac Troyes | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Estac Troyes | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 316 | Accurate passes | 527Lead |
| 383 | Total passes | 602Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Estac Troyes | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Estac Troyes | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Estac Troyes | Statistic | Grenoble |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |