Match statistics snapshot
- Famalicao created the clearer chances on xG (0.36 vs 0.89, Δ 0.53).
- Famalicao fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Estoril was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Estoril | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 0.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.89Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Estoril | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 316 | Accurate passes | 349Lead |
| 403 | Total passes | 429Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Estoril | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Estoril | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Estoril | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.