Match statistics snapshot
- Famalicao created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 1.14, Δ 0.15).
- Estoril fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- Famalicao was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Estoril | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Estoril | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 356 | Accurate passes | 359Lead |
| 422 | Total passes | 429Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Estoril | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Estoril | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.67 | Goals prevented | -0.67 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Estoril | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |