Match statistics snapshot
- Banfield created the clearer chances on xG (0.45 vs 1.12, Δ 0.67).
- Banfield fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Banfield was more accurate in front of goal (21% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Estudiantes De Rio Cuarto | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Estudiantes De Rio Cuarto | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 281Lead | Accurate passes | 177 |
| 381Lead | Total passes | 283 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Estudiantes De Rio Cuarto | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Estudiantes De Rio Cuarto | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Estudiantes De Rio Cuarto | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |