Match statistics snapshot
- Etar Veliko Tarnovo created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 0.66, Δ 0.33).
- CSKA 1948 fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- CSKA 1948 was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Etar Veliko Tarnovo | Statistic | Cska 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Etar Veliko Tarnovo | Statistic | Cska 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 258 | Accurate passes | 398Lead |
| 331 | Total passes | 473Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Etar Veliko Tarnovo | Statistic | Cska 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Etar Veliko Tarnovo | Statistic | Cska 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Etar Veliko Tarnovo | Statistic | Cska 1948 |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.