Match statistics snapshot
- Cobresal fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 9%).
- Cobresal held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 328 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 428 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.