Match statistics snapshot
- Everton de Vina fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Coquimbo Unido was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 38%).
- Everton de Vina held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 326Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 434Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.