Match statistics snapshot
- U.
- Catolica created the clearer chances on xG (0.77 vs 1.84, Δ 1.07).
- Everton de Vina fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 0.77 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.84Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 220Lead | Accurate passes | 191 |
| 297Lead | Total passes | 286 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |