Match statistics snapshot
- Everton de Vina fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Universidad de Chile was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 42%).
- Universidad de Chile held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 5 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 193 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 286 | Total passes | 492Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| 2 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |