Match statistics snapshot
- Everton de Vina fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Universidad de Chile was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 54%).
- Universidad de Chile held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 212 | Accurate passes | 301Lead |
| 314 | Total passes | 394Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.