Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad de Chile fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 29%).
- Universidad de Chile held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 200 | Accurate passes | 320Lead |
| 282 | Total passes | 421Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.