Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad de Chile fired more attempts (20 vs 11 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 15%).
- Universidad de Chile held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 215 | Accurate passes | 356Lead |
| 288 | Total passes | 430Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 5Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.