Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad de Chile fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 40%).
- Universidad de Chile held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 167 | Accurate passes | 374Lead |
| 257 | Total passes | 464Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.