Match statistics snapshot
- Everton de Vina fired more attempts (20 vs 8 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
- Everton de Vina held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Concepcion |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Concepcion |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 391Lead | Accurate passes | 262 |
| 465Lead | Total passes | 329 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Concepcion |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Concepcion |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Everton De Vina | Statistic | Universidad De Concepcion |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.