Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (0.68 vs 1.51, Δ 0.83).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Excelsior | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 0.68 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.51Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Excelsior | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 301 | Accurate passes | 357Lead |
| 384 | Total passes | 445Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Excelsior | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Excelsior | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Excelsior | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |