Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham fired more attempts (19 vs 3 shots).
- Exeter City was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 16%).
- Birmingham held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 182 | Accurate passes | 437Lead |
| 262 | Total passes | 526Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Birmingham |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |