Match statistics snapshot
- Exeter City fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Exeter City was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 27%).
- Exeter City held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 355Lead | Accurate passes | 182 |
| 503Lead | Total passes | 314 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |