Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (8 vs 5 shots).
- Exeter City was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 13%).
- Exeter City held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 310Lead | Accurate passes | 274 |
| 424Lead | Total passes | 380 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |