Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 1.53, Δ 0.89).
- Exeter City fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.53Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 438Lead | Accurate passes | 191 |
| 515Lead | Total passes | 270 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Exeter City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.