Match statistics snapshot
- Avispa Fukuoka fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Fagiano Okayama was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 22%).
- Avispa Fukuoka held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 195 | Accurate passes | 340Lead |
| 289 | Total passes | 453Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Avispa Fukuoka |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |