Match statistics snapshot
- Fagiano Okayama created the clearer chances on xG (2.63 vs 2.29, Δ 0.34).
- Fagiano Okayama fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.29 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 217 | Accurate passes | 226Lead |
| 313 | Total passes | 320Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |