Match statistics snapshot
- Fagiano Okayama created the clearer chances on xG (1.90 vs 1.23, Δ 0.67).
- Fagiano Okayama fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 1.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 257 | Accurate passes | 413Lead |
| 354 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fagiano Okayama | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |