Match statistics snapshot
- Baltika created the clearer chances on xG (0.32 vs 0.50, Δ 0.18).
- Fakel fired more attempts (7 vs 5 shots).
- Fakel was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fakel | Statistic | Baltika |
|---|---|---|
| 0.32 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fakel | Statistic | Baltika |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 58%Lead | Pass accuracy | 45% |
| 203Lead | Accurate passes | 119 |
| 351Lead | Total passes | 265 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fakel | Statistic | Baltika |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fakel | Statistic | Baltika |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fakel | Statistic | Baltika |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |