Match statistics snapshot
- Fakel fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Khimki was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fakel | Statistic | Khimki |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fakel | Statistic | Khimki |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 223Lead | Accurate passes | 218 |
| 321 | Total passes | 340Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fakel | Statistic | Khimki |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fakel | Statistic | Khimki |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fakel | Statistic | Khimki |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.