Match statistics snapshot
- Nizhny Novgorod created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 1.32, Δ 0.17).
- Fakel was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 8%).
- Fakel held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fakel | Statistic | Nizhny Novgorod |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fakel | Statistic | Nizhny Novgorod |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 63%Lead | Pass accuracy | 52% |
| 191Lead | Accurate passes | 118 |
| 305Lead | Total passes | 226 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fakel | Statistic | Nizhny Novgorod |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fakel | Statistic | Nizhny Novgorod |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fakel | Statistic | Nizhny Novgorod |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.