Match statistics snapshot
- Helsingborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 1.45, Δ 0.11).
- Falkenbergs FF fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Helsingborg was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Falkenbergs Ff | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.45Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Falkenbergs Ff | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 293 | Accurate passes | 349Lead |
| 361 | Total passes | 421Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Falkenbergs Ff | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Falkenbergs Ff | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Falkenbergs Ff | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |