Match statistics snapshot
- Falkirk created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 1.00, Δ 0.56).
- Falkirk fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Livingston was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Falkirk | Statistic | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Falkirk | Statistic | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 248 | Accurate passes | 349Lead |
| 344 | Total passes | 463Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Falkirk | Statistic | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Falkirk | Statistic | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Falkirk | Statistic | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |