Match statistics snapshot
- Arouca created the clearer chances on xG (0.12 vs 2.35, Δ 2.23).
- Arouca fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Famalicao was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 0.12 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.35Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 328Lead |
| 310 | Total passes | 405Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Arouca |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 24 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.