Match statistics snapshot
- Famalicao created the clearer chances on xG (2.37 vs 0.53, Δ 1.84).
- Famalicao fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Famalicao was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Avs |
|---|---|---|
| 2.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Avs |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 448Lead | Accurate passes | 281 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Avs |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Avs |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| -2.01 | Goals prevented | -2.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Avs |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |