Match statistics snapshot
- Famalicao created the clearer chances on xG (0.89 vs 0.39, Δ 0.50).
- Famalicao fired more attempts (7 vs 5 shots).
- Boavista was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 0.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.39 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 318 | Accurate passes | 324Lead |
| 388 | Total passes | 397Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Famalicao | Statistic | Boavista |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |